By 1808Delaware, includes Delaware County Commissioners News Release
In a letter to the Editor of the Delaware Gazette, and published on the Delaware County website, the three Delaware County Commissioners objected to claimed inaccuracies in a recent Gazette article.
That article, which can be read here, was entitled “Treasurer pushing for inflation relief.”
In addition to the signatures of Commissioners Barb Lewis, Jeff Benton, and Gary Merrell, the letter was signed by County Auditor George Kaitsa. The letter to the Editor reads as follows:
“To the Editor of The Delaware Gazette:
We are writing to address inaccuracies published by The Delaware Gazette in the July 8, 2022, article entitled “Treasurer pushing for inflation relief.”
The county sales tax: The county’s sales tax is not 1.5%. It is 1.25% except in those areas within COTA’s service territory where another 0.5% is collected for a total of 1.75%. The state’s sales tax rate is 5.75%, not 5.5%.*
A change in the county’s rate would not be immediate. It must be submitted to the Ohio Tax Commissioner and can only take effect on the first day of the calendar quarter at least 65 days after that notice. It is also not possible to make the reduction temporary. The County Commissioners would have to take action to increase the tax back to its current rate: That increase would be subject to a 45-day referendum period and then the same 65-day notice period before it could take effect on the first day of the calendar quarter after the notice period.
Additionally, we believe it is premature to consider reducing the county sales tax rate. While the current sales tax through June is tracking $5.2 million ahead of our budget estimate, the percentage of the amount exceeding our budget estimate for each month has been declining. In January, we exceeded our monthly budget estimate by 16.8%. In June, it had dropped to 5.3%. We expect to see the continued impact of inflation and rising gas prices in our August sales tax figures.
[* Please note that, on 7/13/22, the Gazette altered the quote in the original story published on 7/8/22 to correct Mr. Rankey’s erroneous statement that the sales tax rates were 1.5% and 5.5%.]The proposed $1,500 bonus: The bonus has been proposed for non-union employees. The Commissioners feel an organization-wide wage study and adjustments based on that study would be a more effective form of equity for all employees. They perform wage studies every three years or when requested for non-union and Job & Family Service employees, and they are undertaking one this year. They will invite other elected officials to participate if they so choose.
Health insurance costs: Rankey’s assertion that premiums rose 14% last year is incorrect. The premium categories are based on 1) whether the employee (and a spouse if there is one) complete the county’s Wellness Program, reducing their premium by $600 per year if just the employee completes it or $1,200 if both the employee and spouse complete it; and 2) four rate levels ranging from single employee to employee with family members. The median category’s premiums rose 8.7%. The full range of increases was 6.9% to 11.8%. Note: this year, we introduced a $50/month surcharge for spouses who opt into the county’s health insurance despite having access to health insurance at the spouse’s employer. This surcharge is negated when the employee completes the Wellness Program.
Accusations that funds are being hoarded: Of the $315 million that we believe Mr. Rankey is basing his proposals on, more than $200 million is restricted. A total of $89.3 million comes from tax levies and other sources earmarked for operations and services provided by levy agencies. These include 9-1-1, the Delaware County Board of Developmental Disabilities, Preservation Parks, the Delaware Public Health District and the Delaware-Morrow Mental Health & Recovery Services Board. This money may only be used for purposes authorized by state law and do not represent idle county funds.
Another $116.9 million represents funds that are restricted for agency operations and are already encumbered or earmarked for operating expenses and capital expenditures for the various departments and offices funded by the county.
None of these funds could or should be used for investments in long-term securities as Mr. Rankey is seeking, nor could they be reallocated by the Commissioners for alternative uses. The balance is available to be invested in accordance with the county’s investment policies, but invested in such a manner to ensure funds are available for future anticipated operating expenses and capital expenditures when needed.
The impacts of reducing any tax collection: The decision to reduce taxes also must be weighed against a variety of factors, including how it might impact the county’s AAA bond ratings and force us to borrow money to complete major capital projects such as the Byxbe Campus and roads and sewer construction. We believe the taxpayers are best served by the county’s ability to finance the capital needs of a growing county without having to borrow money. Damage to our bond ratings would increase the interest rate we would have to pay to borrow money.
Continued accusations of a lack of leadership and vision by other county elected officials: Finally, Mr. Rankey’s charge that there are no plans or vision for the spending of funds is inaccurate and disrespectful: There are detailed strategic plans in place for many county’s offices and departments, including the sewer system, roads and bridges, economic development, emergency medical services, 9-1-1 services, and facilities.
It has long been a hallmark of Delaware County government to treat our constituents and our fellow elected officials with respect and we call upon Mr. Rankey to join us in continuing this tradition. We further call upon The Delaware Gazette to independently fact check all submissions it receives before publishing them and to provide anyone mentioned in them the opportunity to respond before publication.
